Compare

Side by side

Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.

Selected 1 of 3

Comparison
Thymalin

Immune

Evidence level
Anecdotal evidence
Approval status
Not approved
Mechanism of action
  1. 1.A peptide extract of calf thymus, containing a mixture of short thymic peptides rather than one defined molecule.
  2. 2.Proposed to support T-cell maturation and immune regulation, since the thymus is where T cells develop.
  3. 3.Russian research reports normalised immune markers in elderly patients.
  4. 4.Because the product is a mixture, its active components and doses are not standardised between batches.
  5. 5.No mechanism has been confirmed in controlled Western studies.
Studied for
  • Immune ageing and recurrent infection claims
  • Post-illness recovery in Russian practice
  • Thymic peptide research
  • No controlled Western trials exist
Reported effects
  • Reported improvements in immune markers in Russian studies
  • Reported fewer infections in user accounts
  • No verified clinical effect in independent trials
Side effects
  • Not systematically studied
  • Injection-site reactions
  • Allergic reactions to animal-derived material are possible
  • Long-term safety and batch consistency unknown
Research protocol

Research context only — there is no approved protocol. Russian publications describe intramuscular courses of 5–10 mg daily for 5–10 days, repeated every few months; these are not validated regimens and product composition varies by manufacturer. No human safety data from regulated trials exist.

Research context only

Evidence justification
The evidence base is Russian-language animal and small clinical work that has not been independently replicated; there are no peer-reviewed controlled trials in English.