Compare

Side by side

Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.

Selected 1 of 3

Comparison
Tesamorelin

Growth hormone secretagogue

Evidence level
Moderate evidence
Approval status
Approved drug
Mechanism of action
  1. 1.Binds GHRH receptors in the pituitary, prompting the gland to release growth hormone in its natural pulsatile pattern.
  2. 2.Growth hormone then raises IGF-1, mainly produced in the liver.
  3. 3.Unlike continuous growth hormone exposure, pulsatile release favours fat mobilisation over fluid retention.
  4. 4.Visceral fat — the fat around internal organs — falls preferentially, while subcutaneous fat changes little.
Studied for
  • HIV-associated lipodystrophy with excess visceral fat (the approved indication)
  • Liver fat in people living with HIV
  • Visceral adiposity in the general population (studied, not approved)
  • Muscle mass and physical function in older adults (small studies)
  • Cognitive outcomes in small trials
Reported effects
  • Roughly 15–18% reduction in visceral adipose tissue at 26–52 weeks in randomised trials
  • Sustained rises in IGF-1
  • Reduced liver fat in a subset of participants
  • Little change in subcutaneous fat or total body weight
  • Improved triglyceride levels in some trials
Side effects
  • Injection-site reactions, sometimes with nodules or bleeding
  • Joint pain and peripheral swelling
  • Carpal tunnel symptoms
  • Raised IGF-1, which requires monitoring
  • Possible effects on blood glucose
  • Theoretical concern about growth promotion in existing tumours with sustained GH and IGF-1 elevation
Research protocol

Research context only — dosing is set by the prescribing physician. Trials used 2 mg subcutaneously once daily for 26–52 weeks, with IGF-1 monitored periodically. This is not a weight-loss protocol and it is not a general-purpose GH protocol.

Research context only

Evidence justification
Several randomised controlled trials with imaging-based fat endpoints supported regulatory approval, but the evidence is concentrated in one population (HIV lipodystrophy) and covers relatively short durations.