Compare
Side by side
Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.
Selected 1 of 3
Comparison
Teicoplanin
Antimicrobial
Evidence level
Moderate evidence
Approval status
Approved drug
Mechanism of action
- 1.Binds D-Ala-D-Ala precursors and blocks peptidoglycan cross-linking, like vancomycin.
- 2.Bactericidal against dividing Gram-positive bacteria.
- 3.Its long fatty acid chain anchors it in the bacterial membrane, which slows clearance and lengthens its half-life.
- 4.Not absorbed orally, so the oral form is used only for gut infections.
- 5.Ineffective against Gram-negative organisms.
Studied for
- Complicated skin and soft tissue infection
- Bone and joint infection, including outpatient therapy
- Endocarditis caused by Gram-positive organisms
- Clostridioides difficile infection (oral)
- Surgical prophylaxis in some European centres
Reported effects
- Clinical cure rates broadly comparable to vancomycin in comparative trials
- Once-daily maintenance dosing after loading
- Less infusion-related flushing than vancomycin
- Nephrotoxicity reported, though possibly less than with vancomycin
Side effects
- Rash, including rare severe cutaneous reactions
- Thrombocytopenia
- Raised liver enzymes
- Nephrotoxicity
- Injection-site pain
- Infusion-related reactions
Research protocol
Research context only - a hospital antibiotic. Loading is typically 6 mg per kilogram (up to 12 mg per kilogram for serious infection) every 12 hours for three to five doses, then once daily with dose adjustment for kidney function; trough levels are monitored in serious infection. Comparative trials assess clinical and microbiological cure at end of treatment.
Research context only
Evidence justification
Several randomised comparisons with vancomycin exist and outcomes are similar, but the trials are smaller and fewer than the vancomycin literature, and it lacks US approval.