Compare

Side by side

Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.

Selected 1 of 3

Comparison
Salmon calcitonin

Bone & endocrine

Evidence level
Moderate evidence
Approval status
Approved drug
Mechanism of action
  1. 1.Binds calcitonin receptors on osteoclasts, the cells that dissolve bone.
  2. 2.Inhibits osteoclast activity, so bone resorption falls within hours of a dose.
  3. 3.Lowers serum calcium by reducing release from bone and increasing kidney calcium excretion.
  4. 4.Also appears to have analgesic effects on bone pain through mechanisms that are not fully explained.
Studied for
  • Paget's disease of bone
  • Hypercalcaemia caused by cancer
  • Postmenopausal osteoporosis (withdrawn in the EU over long-term cancer risk)
  • Bone pain from osteoporotic fractures or metastases
  • Complex regional pain syndrome (small studies)
Reported effects
  • Modest increases in spinal bone mineral density of roughly 1–2%
  • Reduced bone pain in some patients with osteoporotic fractures
  • Rapid but short-lived lowering of serum calcium
  • Fracture reduction data are weak compared with modern treatments
  • Antibodies to salmon calcitonin can form with long-term use, reducing effect
Side effects
  • Nasal irritation, rhinitis and nosebleeds with the spray
  • Nausea, flushing and vomiting, especially with injections
  • Back pain and joint pain
  • Hypocalcaemia with repeated dosing
  • Possible increased risk of cancer with long-term use
  • Antibody formation reducing effectiveness
Research protocol

Research context only — this is a prescription medicine. Common study regimens were 200 IU daily by nasal spray, or 100 IU by injection. Treatment is time-limited and monitored by a doctor because of the cancer signal and hypocalcaemia risk.

Research context only

Evidence justification
Multiple randomised trials and decades of use support the bone-density and calcium-lowering effects, but fracture data are limited and regulators restricted the main indication over long-term safety.