Compare
Side by side
Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.
Selected 1 of 3
Comparison
Larazotide
Immune
Evidence level
Moderate evidence
Approval status
Not approved
Mechanism of action
- 1.Acts on the protein zonulin, which opens the tight junctions between intestinal lining cells.
- 2.By opposing zonulin, it keeps those junctions closed and reduces paracellular permeability — the gaps through which larger fragments cross the gut wall.
- 3.In coeliac disease, gluten fragments crossing that barrier trigger the immune reaction that damages the intestine.
- 4.The peptide works upstream of the immune response; it does not suppress the immune system or repair existing damage.
Studied for
- Coeliac disease in people already on a gluten-free diet
- Persistent symptoms despite a gluten-free diet
- Intestinal permeability in healthy volunteers
- Irritable bowel syndrome (early-stage only)
Reported effects
- Reduced intestinal permeability markers in early studies
- Some improvement in gastrointestinal symptom scores in a phase 2b trial
- Phase 3 trial did not meet its primary endpoint, which ended the development programme
- No meaningful change in intestinal villous architecture
Side effects
- Adverse events were similar to placebo in the published trials
- Mild gastrointestinal symptoms
- Headache
- Long-term safety was never established because development stopped
Research protocol
Research context only — there is no approved product. Trials used oral capsules of 0.125–1 mg taken three times daily before meals for 12–52 weeks. It was always investigated as an add-on to a gluten-free diet, never as a replacement.
Research context only
Evidence justification
Several randomised controlled trials were completed, so the human data are comparatively substantial — but the results were inconsistent and the definitive phase 3 trial was negative.