Compare

Side by side

Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.

Selected 1 of 3

Comparison
Evidence level
Moderate evidence
Approval status
Not approved
Mechanism of action
  1. 1.Acts on the protein zonulin, which opens the tight junctions between intestinal lining cells.
  2. 2.By opposing zonulin, it keeps those junctions closed and reduces paracellular permeability — the gaps through which larger fragments cross the gut wall.
  3. 3.In coeliac disease, gluten fragments crossing that barrier trigger the immune reaction that damages the intestine.
  4. 4.The peptide works upstream of the immune response; it does not suppress the immune system or repair existing damage.
Studied for
  • Coeliac disease in people already on a gluten-free diet
  • Persistent symptoms despite a gluten-free diet
  • Intestinal permeability in healthy volunteers
  • Irritable bowel syndrome (early-stage only)
Reported effects
  • Reduced intestinal permeability markers in early studies
  • Some improvement in gastrointestinal symptom scores in a phase 2b trial
  • Phase 3 trial did not meet its primary endpoint, which ended the development programme
  • No meaningful change in intestinal villous architecture
Side effects
  • Adverse events were similar to placebo in the published trials
  • Mild gastrointestinal symptoms
  • Headache
  • Long-term safety was never established because development stopped
Research protocol

Research context only — there is no approved product. Trials used oral capsules of 0.125–1 mg taken three times daily before meals for 12–52 weeks. It was always investigated as an add-on to a gluten-free diet, never as a replacement.

Research context only

Evidence justification
Several randomised controlled trials were completed, so the human data are comparatively substantial — but the results were inconsistent and the definitive phase 3 trial was negative.