Compare

Side by side

Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.

Selected 1 of 3

Comparison
Intranasal insulin

Cognitive & neuro

Evidence level
Limited evidence
Approval status
Investigational
Mechanism of action
  1. 1.Insulin receptors are dense in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex and are involved in synaptic plasticity.
  2. 2.The nasal route delivers insulin to cerebrospinal fluid within about 15 to 30 minutes in studies.
  3. 3.Functional imaging shows increased hippocampal and prefrontal activity after nasal doses.
  4. 4.Reported modulation of amyloid and tau handling in cell and animal work.
  5. 5.Systemic absorption is limited, which is why hypoglycaemia is uncommon but possible.
Studied for
  • Amnestic mild cognitive impairment
  • Mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease
  • Memory in healthy adults
  • Cognition in type 2 diabetes
  • Large multicentre trials of nasal insulin in Alzheimer's disease
Reported effects
  • Some single-centre trials reported improved delayed verbal memory and preserved brain glucose metabolism
  • Larger multicentre trials showed modest or no overall benefit
  • Results across studies are inconsistent, with responders not predictable
  • Occasional mild hypoglycaemia
Side effects
  • Nasal irritation and runny nose
  • Mild hypoglycaemia in a minority
  • Headache
  • Hypokalaemia with high systemic exposure
Research protocol

Research context only - investigational. Trials typically used 20 to 40 international units once or twice daily through a metered nasal device for 4 weeks to 12 months, with delayed recall and brain imaging as endpoints, and blood glucose monitored because a fraction is absorbed.

Research context only

Evidence justification
Several randomised trials exist but they are small and disagree; the larger multicentre studies did not confirm the memory benefits seen in single-centre work.