Compare
Side by side
Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.
Selected 1 of 3
Comparison
Glatiramer acetate
Cognitive & neuro
Evidence level
Strong evidence
Approval status
Approved drug
Mechanism of action
- 1.Binds MHC class II molecules and competes with myelin antigens for presentation.
- 2.Shifts T helper cells toward anti-inflammatory, regulatory phenotypes.
- 3.Induces myelin-reactive T cells that secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines.
- 4.Promotes repair-supporting behaviour in antigen-presenting cells.
- 5.Its heterogeneous polypeptide mixture is why it is regulated as a complex biological mixture.
Studied for
- Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (annualised relapse rate)
- Clinically isolated syndrome
- MRI lesion activity
- Long-term disability trajectories in extension studies
Reported effects
- Roughly 29% reduction in annualised relapse rate versus placebo in the pivotal trial
- Fewer new MRI lesions
- Modest effect on disability progression over years
- Frequent injection-site reactions and a post-injection flushing reaction
Side effects
- Injection-site reactions, including lipoatrophy with long-term use
- Post-injection reaction with flushing, chest tightness and palpitations
- Headache
- Nausea
- Arthralgia
- Rarely, a systemic hypersensitivity reaction
Research protocol
Research context only - prescription medicine. Licensed regimens are 20 mg subcutaneously once daily or 40 mg three times weekly; the pivotal trial ran two years with annualised relapse rate as the primary endpoint, and extension cohorts have followed patients for over a decade, though not in a controlled design.
Research context only
Evidence justification
A pivotal randomised placebo-controlled trial with relapse rate and MRI endpoints, plus two decades of follow-up data, and regulatory approval worldwide.