Compare

Side by side

Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.

Selected 1 of 3

Comparison
Glatiramer acetate

Cognitive & neuro

Evidence level
Strong evidence
Approval status
Approved drug
Mechanism of action
  1. 1.Binds MHC class II molecules and competes with myelin antigens for presentation.
  2. 2.Shifts T helper cells toward anti-inflammatory, regulatory phenotypes.
  3. 3.Induces myelin-reactive T cells that secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines.
  4. 4.Promotes repair-supporting behaviour in antigen-presenting cells.
  5. 5.Its heterogeneous polypeptide mixture is why it is regulated as a complex biological mixture.
Studied for
  • Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (annualised relapse rate)
  • Clinically isolated syndrome
  • MRI lesion activity
  • Long-term disability trajectories in extension studies
Reported effects
  • Roughly 29% reduction in annualised relapse rate versus placebo in the pivotal trial
  • Fewer new MRI lesions
  • Modest effect on disability progression over years
  • Frequent injection-site reactions and a post-injection flushing reaction
Side effects
  • Injection-site reactions, including lipoatrophy with long-term use
  • Post-injection reaction with flushing, chest tightness and palpitations
  • Headache
  • Nausea
  • Arthralgia
  • Rarely, a systemic hypersensitivity reaction
Research protocol

Research context only - prescription medicine. Licensed regimens are 20 mg subcutaneously once daily or 40 mg three times weekly; the pivotal trial ran two years with annualised relapse rate as the primary endpoint, and extension cohorts have followed patients for over a decade, though not in a controlled design.

Research context only

Evidence justification
A pivotal randomised placebo-controlled trial with relapse rate and MRI endpoints, plus two decades of follow-up data, and regulatory approval worldwide.