Compare

Side by side

Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.

Selected 1 of 3

Comparison
CJC-1295 (no DAC) + Ipamorelin blend

Growth hormone secretagogue

Evidence level
Anecdotal evidence
Approval status
Not approved
Mechanism of action
  1. 1.The GHRH fragment binds pituitary GHRH receptors, priming growth-hormone release.
  2. 2.Ipamorelin acts on the ghrelin receptor, GHS-R1a, to trigger the release itself.
  3. 3.Together they are said to produce a larger pulse than either alone — shown in growth-hormone testing, but never linked to a proven body-composition or recovery outcome.
  4. 4.Both are short-acting, so a dose produces a brief pulse rather than sustained elevation.
  5. 5.IGF-1 rises secondarily with repeated use.
Studied for
  • Growth-hormone secretion and pulsatility research
  • Body-composition and recovery claims, without trials
  • Sleep and 'anti-ageing' claims, anecdote only
  • Diagnostic growth-hormone stimulation testing for the GHRH component
Reported effects
  • A measurable growth-hormone pulse after dosing
  • Modest IGF-1 increase with repeated use
  • Reported improved sleep and recovery from user accounts
  • Fluid retention and joint stiffness, as with the growth-hormone class
Side effects
  • Headache, flushing and dizziness
  • Water retention and joint aches
  • Tingling or numbness in the hands
  • Increased appetite
  • Unknown long-term effects of chronic IGF-1 elevation
Research protocol

Research context only — no approved protocol exists. Community schedules use roughly 200 micrograms of each peptide once or twice daily, cycling 8–12 weeks on with 2–4 weeks off; 12 syringe units from a 3 ml reconstitution is a common vendor figure. None of this has been evaluated in a trial, and units depend on the exact concentrations in the vial.

Research context only

Evidence justification
Small studies document growth-hormone release from the individual peptides, but no trial has examined the blend or any of the outcomes it is sold for.