Compare

Side by side

Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.

Selected 1 of 3

Comparison
Bortezomib

Oncology

Evidence level
Strong evidence
Approval status
Approved drug
Mechanism of action
  1. 1.Binds the chymotrypsin-like active site of the 26S proteasome.
  2. 2.Blocks degradation of ubiquitin-tagged proteins, including I-kappa-B.
  3. 3.Stabilised I-kappa-B keeps NF-kappa-B switched off, so survival signals fade.
  4. 4.Cancer cells accumulate misfolded protein and die, while normal cells tolerate it better.
  5. 5.Also affects the bone marrow microenvironment that supports myeloma cells.
Studied for
  • Multiple myeloma, first line and relapsed
  • Mantle cell lymphoma
  • AL amyloidosis
  • Combination regimens with lenalidomide, dexamethasone or cyclophosphamide
Reported effects
  • Substantially higher response and survival rates in myeloma than the older melphalan era
  • Peripheral neuropathy in a third or more of patients, dose-limiting
  • Thrombocytopenia that cycles with the dosing schedule
  • Shingles reactivation without antiviral prophylaxis
Side effects
  • Peripheral sensory neuropathy, sometimes painful and persistent
  • Thrombocytopenia and anaemia
  • Herpes zoster reactivation
  • Nausea, diarrhoea and constipation
  • Fatigue
  • Hypotension
  • Rare pulmonary toxicity and heart failure
Research protocol

Research context only - a specialist cancer medicine. The standard schedule is 1.3 mg per square metre on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle, given intravenously or subcutaneously, for up to eight cycles; trials used response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival as endpoints, with antiviral prophylaxis and platelet monitoring throughout.

Research context only

Evidence justification
Multiple large randomised controlled trials in myeloma (APEX, VISTA, and combination studies) with survival endpoints, and worldwide regulatory approval.