Compare

Side by side

Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.

Selected 1 of 3

Comparison
Evidence level
Limited evidence
Approval status
Investigational
Mechanism of action
  1. 1.Binds the innate repair receptor, a complex formed by the erythropoietin receptor and its partner CD131.
  2. 2.That receptor is involved in tissue-protective signalling rather than red-blood-cell production, so it does not raise haematocrit like erythropoietin.
  3. 3.Reduces inflammatory cytokine signalling in laboratory models.
  4. 4.Protects nerve tissue in animal models of neuropathy.
  5. 5.Clinical trials in people have not translated these findings into consistent benefit.
Studied for
  • Sarcoidosis-associated small-fibre neuropathy
  • Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
  • Inflammatory and tissue-protective pathways
  • Type 2 diabetes complications (early trials)
Reported effects
  • Improved small-nerve function measures in early trials
  • Reduced inflammatory markers in some studies
  • Reported reduced pain from user accounts
  • No confirmed effect on wound healing in humans
Side effects
  • Injection-site reactions
  • Headache
  • Transient increases in inflammatory markers in some patients
  • Long-term safety unknown
Research protocol

Research context only — no approved protocol exists. Trials used daily subcutaneous doses in the 2–4 mg range for 4–12 weeks in sarcoidosis-associated small-fibre neuropathy and diabetic neuropathy. Outcomes were mixed and the compound has not progressed to approval; self-administered regimens sold online have no evidence base.

Research context only

Evidence justification
Phase 1 and small phase 2 trials exist in sarcoidosis and diabetic nerve pain with mixed results; nothing is approved and larger trials have not confirmed benefit.