Compare
Side by side
Pick up to three peptides to see how their mechanisms, studied uses and evidence levels differ. Rows where the entries disagree are marked with a blue edge.
Selected 1 of 3
Comparison
AOD-9604
Cosmetic & dermatologic
Evidence level
Limited evidence
Approval status
Not approved
Mechanism of action
- 1.In laboratory fat cells, the fragment stimulates lipolysis — the breakdown of stored fat into fatty acids.
- 2.It is designed to keep growth hormone's fat effects without raising IGF-1 or affecting blood glucose, based on animal data.
- 3.That separation is the central claim, and it is precisely what the human trials failed to translate into weight loss.
- 4.The parent hormone's fat effects depend on much more than this short region, which may explain the gap between laboratory and human results.
Studied for
- Obesity (phase 2 and phase 3 trials, results negative)
- Lipodystrophy (studied, not approved)
- Cartilage repair in laboratory and animal models
- Muscle wasting in small early studies
Reported effects
- No statistically significant weight loss versus placebo in the completed human trials
- Lipolysis in isolated fat cells
- Marketed claims of 'fat burning without hormone effects' are not supported by the human trial results
- Long-term body-composition effects in humans are unestablished
Side effects
- Reported as generally well tolerated in the trials
- Mild gastrointestinal symptoms in some participants
- No long-term safety data
- Injectable products sold online are unregulated and of unknown purity
Research protocol
Research context only — no approved protocol and no legitimate product. Trials used oral doses in the 1–3 mg per day range for 12–24 weeks, and the primary weight-loss endpoints were not met. This is a record of what was studied, not a recommendation.
Research context only
Evidence justification
Human randomised trials exist but were small and did not demonstrate the marketed effect, so the human evidence is both thin and negative.